|
Spring 2002 Newsletter
Table of Contents
-
Ethics
and Fundraising by Dree Thompson-Diamond and Andrea MacManus
-
Information
and Referral Service by The Support Network
-
Alberta
Members Participate in the Voluntary Sector Initiative by Janet
Lavoie
-
Provincial
Inspections of Charitable Organizations
-
To
Receipt or Not to Receipt by Betty Thompson
-
Strengthening
your Board/Staff Partnership by Wendy MacDonald
-
Students
Provide Pro Bono Legal Assistance by Anita Mohan
-
Good Idea
from Hanna
-
Fundraising
Volunteers: Where can I find them? Is there a secret hideout where
they congregate? by Laura Berezan
-
Book
Review: Grantseekers Toolkit
-
Ethics
and Fundraising by Dree Thompson-Diamond and Andrea MacManus
Martin
Luther King once said, “The true measure of a man is not where he stands
in times of comfort and convenience, but where he stands in times of
challenge and controversy.” This holds very true for all of us who
face ethical issues within our organizations.
It
is our experience that once you are in the realm of relationships; you are
in the realm of ethics. Sometimes the realm is crystal clear, other
times it is a varying shade of grey. Our ability to deal with
ethical issues is made easier when we adhere to a Code of Ethics and
Standards of Practice, and to the policies and procedures that guide our
decision-making.
Why
are ethics and standards of practice important? Organizations that
actively fund raise are facing increased competition and scrutiny from a
diversity of sectors. Whether it is a request by donors and
supporters for visible and accessible accountability, questions from key
volunteers who want more information and involvement, governments seeking
more accurate reporting or media attention, ethics and standards of
practice provide a framework for charities and not-for-profit groups.
While
many may suggest that ethical issues are not a significant concern, recent
findings indicate that over 70% of professional fundraisers encounter an
ethical issue in their first three years of practice. While there
are no direct statistics available for those with fund raising as a part
of their role, our experience suggests that the incidence of ethical
issues is as high for those with only a partial focus on fund raising.
So
what is Accountability? It is the requirement to explain and accept
responsibility for carrying out a mandate in light of agreed upon
expectations. In doing this, an organization must take into
consideration public trust, information regarding outcomes and
responsibility for these outcomes.
Are
there potential costs to unethical action? Yes. Some of these
include donor loss, loss of credibility with other donors as word spreads,
job loss, loss of peer respect, loss of revenue, loss of public respect
and client support, potential loss of charitable status, loss of
Association of Fundraising Professional’s certification and/or
membership.
So, what governs ethics in the charitable and
not-for-profit sectors? While there are a number of groups that
provide guidelines for Ethics and Standards of Practice, these are the
ones that we reference and adhere to:
-
Revenue
Canada requirements (T3010)
-
Charitable
Fund Raising Act of Alberta
-
Canadian
Centre for Philanthropy Standards of Ethical Practice
-
Association
of Fundraising Professionals Code of Ethics & Standards of
Practice
-
Donor
Bill of Rights
-
Privacy
legislation (both Provincial and Federal)
-
Common
sense
-
Open
communication
-
Sense
of values
-
Honesty
and integrity
In addition, we find that those organizations and
practitioners who navigate ethical issues effectively do so because they
have a set of current policies and procedures to refer to. We
recommend that these include, but not be limited to:
-
Gift
acceptance
-
Gift
processing
-
Donor
recognition
-
Naming
-
Endowment
management
As fund
development practitioners (whether full or part-time), we are often the
ultimate stewards of relationships, the person with the most donor
contact, the person donors are directed to and who they call, the person
with a hand on the information. Ours, in conjunction with the board
and Executive Director, is the visible accountability voice for our
organization.
So, as an accountable, ethical practitioner, what
should you be doing to enhance the ethical and practice standards of your
organization?
-
Ensure
codes are adopted and understood by board(s) and senior staff
-
Ensure
dollars are spent where they are intended
-
Be
involved in filing the T3010 document(s)
-
Track
your disbursement quota
-
Take
responsibility for tracking and reporting internally and externally
-
Implement
confidentiality agreements
-
Recommend
policies and procedures
-
Provide
or recommend internal education
-
Know
where to go for help and counsel
Dree Thomson-Diamond and Andrea McManus are
active development consultants working with clients to facilitate
effective, well-managed communication, marketing and fund development
programs. They can be reached as follows:
Dree
Thomson-Diamond, CFRE
Development Consultant
4908 126 Street, Edmonton, AB T6H 3W2
Phone: 780-438-1093 Cell: 780-903-0481
Fax: 780-438-1159
E-mail:
dree.thomson@telusplanet.net
Andrea
McManus, CFRE
Managing Partner
The Development Group
Box 72151, 1600 - 90th Avenue SW, Calgary, Alberta T2V 5H9
Phone: 403-210-3157
Fax: 403-289-7485
E-mail: andreamcmanus@shaw.ca
Top of
Page
-
Information
and Referral Service by The Support Network
The Support Network will
be offering a Volunteer Information and
Referral Service to meet the immediate need for volunteer referral.
This service builds on the existing Community Service Referral Line and
The Support Network’s web enhanced database. The Line will act as
a conduit between individuals seeking volunteer opportunities and
organizations involving volunteers in the greater Edmonton region.
The Service
The Support Network will provide callers who have
volunteer enquiries with contact information for organizations that have
volunteer opportunities. Information and Referral Specialists will
help callers find relevant volunteer jobs that match their needs: issues
of interest, geographical area, population served.
The Client
Volunteers from the greater Edmonton region.
Organizations
who wish to list volunteer roles need to contact The Support Network
Primary focus: Non-profit human and social services related to basic subsistence
and survival; or help for people who may experience barriers to service.
Secondary
focus: Non-profit organizations providing other community
services.
Responsibility
of listed organization
The organization will provide The Support Network
with an overview of the work they do, current and accurate contact
information and volunteer roles. The organization will adhere to the
values, principles and standards of the Canadian Code of Volunteer
Involvement.
The responsibility for recruiting, screening
and placing volunteers will still reside within the listed organization.
Responsibility
of The Support Network
-
To receive information provided by organizations for the database
-
To respond to volunteer enquiries
-
To provide referrals to volunteers based on their interests and
needs
Call
The Support Network at: 780-482-0198.
Top of
Page
-
Alberta
Members Participate in the Voluntary Sector Initiative by Janet Lavoie
The VSI, or Voluntary
Sector Initiative, is one of the most important initiatives to happen
within the voluntary sector in decades. Some of you have participated in
consultations organized by the VSI over the past 18 months and others have
heard of the VSI through seeing its materials. No matter how you’ve been
introduced, it’s challenging to grasp the many facets of the Initiative.
One of the best ways to do this is through learning about the Albertans
directly involved in the Tables of the VSI.
Your
Alberta Table Members are a talented, dedicated and determined group,
fondly referred to in Ottawa as the ‘Alberta Six’. Two hail from
Edmonton and four from Calgary, and as with many other volunteer
commitments, their participation with the VSI has been more exciting and
demanding than they may have foreseen.
Adriana
Davies is the Executive Director of Edmonton’s Heritage Community
Foundation and sits on the Capacity Joint
Table of the VSI. The Capacity Joint Table has a broad mandate with
four main goals: to conduct research on the sector and share the
information, to propose solutions for human resources issues, to enable
the voluntary sector to become more of a force in shaping public policy
and to collaborate with the Working Group on Financing. Adriana also
co-chairs the Research Steering Committee guiding the development of the
National Survey of Voluntary Organizations, to be completed in spring
2004. For the first time, we will have data about voluntary organizations
that can be used to determine capacity issues and possible solutions. It
will also be a companion to the highly successful Canada Survey of Giving,
Volunteering and Participating.
Bob
Wyatt is Executive Director of the
Muttart Foundation and spends many hours wrestling with the complex and
challenging issues faced by the Regulatory
Table, which is reviewing Canada's
regulatory framework as it relates to the voluntary sector. The Table is
responsible for a number of projects, including reporting on whether the
Canada Customs and Revenue Agency, or some other authority, should be the
regulator of charities. It will also recommend a more appropriate appeals
mechanism for matters related to charitable registration and
deregistration and is reviewing the need for clearer guidelines on the
type and degree of business activities charities can legally engage in.
The Table is currently piloting a newly developed shortened annual
information return for charities, something many of us can look forward
to.
Dan
O’Grady, Manager, Community Investment, Enbridge Inc. sits on the Working Group on Financing. The
Working Group is distinct from a Table as it does not include government
representatives, and is investigating an issue dear to all of our hearts,
financing of the sector. Among its many projects is the examination and
recommendation of best practices and funding models. The Working Group is
also working with the Capacity Joint Table to look at the impact of
funding on the sustainability of organizations and is acting as a
reference group on a study which will result in, among other things, a
Code of Good Practice on Funding.
Ian Kershaw
is a member of the IM/IT Joint Table and
has worked with the Table to research the current capacity and needs of
the sector in information management and information technology. Ian’s
down to earth approach and grass roots involvement with organizations of
all sizes helps ensure that the work of his table remains firmly in touch
with reality. The IM/IT Table has three exciting projects in hand that are
being reviewed in response to what the sector has highlighted as
priorities in the area of technology. These are a non-profit
website/portal, access to funder information, and support for technology
planning and implementation. The IM/IT Table recognizes that information
technology is a key element in helping organizations to accomplish their
mission.
Martha
Parker,
Executive Director of Volunteer Calgary, some would say has made her
second home at the VSI where she wears a few hats. Martha’s main role is
to sit on the Joint Coordinating Committee,
which works to provide overall coordination to the Tables and various
projects of the VSI. In a national initiative this unique and complex, the
job of the Coordinating Committee is quite challenging,
and Martha’s group works hard to put the pieces of the puzzle together,
acting as a communications hub, facilitating collaboration between the
various parties and ensuring that the work plans, budgets, research and
communication are on target.
Sue
Tomney, Director of Communications
at TransAlta, lends her passion for the voluntary sector and considerable
communications expertise to the Awareness
Table. The Table’s mandate is to
help Canadians recognize the contribution of the sector to Canada’s
overall social, economic and cultural well-being. The Table is painting a
picture of the sector as a great place for Canadians to invest their time,
skills and financial resources. The Table is also working to develop a
sense of awareness within the sector itself that we are indeed a sector,
that despite our diversity we can make our voice heard on issues that have
an impact on the sector as a whole.
I would be pleased to send you more information on
the VSI or perhaps arrange a presentation at upcoming conferences or
meetings. I can be contacted at Volunteer Calgary (403) 231-1436 or
jlavoie@volunteercalgary.ab.ca. I’d also invite you to check out
the VSI at our website: www.vsi-isbc.ca,
where you can find more complete information on the work of the VSI and
subscribe to receive regular email updates.
Top of
Page
-
Provincial
Inspections of Charitable Organizations
In the past year, Alberta Government Services
completed inspections of 63 Alberta charitable organizations. These
inspections specifically focused on the financial statement presentation
and disclosure requirements set out in the Charitable
Fund-raising Act.
“This was the first year this type of inspection
has been conducted with charitable organizations and it has proven to be a
positive exercise in education and awareness of the requirements of the
Act and its Regulation”, said Scott Hood of Alberta Government Services
Scott indicated that excellent co-operation was
experienced, with only two of the 63 charities chosen for inspection
failing to respond to requests for information. “This resulted in
the suspension of registration of the charitable organizations for failing
to comply.”
The inspections highlighted two key findings;
financial statement presentation and the disclosure of required
information in scripts used to solicit donations.
Specifically, disclosure items missing from the
financial statements were:
-
the
total remuneration paid to employees of the organization whose principal
duties involve fund-raising,
-
the
amount paid to fund-raising businesses,
-
disclosure
of fund-raising expenses, and
-
disclosure
of the accounting policy that their financial statements were based on.
Disclosure items missing from the scripts used to
solicit donations included:
-
the
estimated cost of solicitation,
-
a
contact name for any inquiries,
-
the
name of the fund-raising business used,
-
payment
to fund-raising business, and
-
the
address of the charitable organization.
The participating charities were notified of the
areas of non-compliance and were asked to make the necessary adjustments.
This inspection process has enabled Alberta charities
and the Province to work together towards the common goal of ensuring
consumers are provided sufficient information to make informed decisions
about the charities they wish to support.
If you require more information on how to properly
prepare your financial statements and scripts, visit our website at www.gov.ab.ca/gs,
or contact 1-877-427-4088 to request a Tip Sheet on this and other
consumer related subjects.
Top of
Page
-
To
Receipt or Not to Receipt by Betty Thompson
The application of the
rules and regulations in issuing charitable donation receipts seems to
come as a great surprise to many charitable organizations.
The basis of compliance to Canada Customs and
Revenue Agency (CCRA) Guidelines has not changed in many, many years. The
gifts must be voluntary; they must be property; and no
benefit can accrue to the donor. These considerations should be applied
when determining whether or not a charitable receipt can be issued in a
particular circumstance.
In addition, the concept of fair
market value needs to be understood when determining the valuation of the
property donated and the amount of the receipt.
The four concepts mentioned above
are applied as follows:
1.
The gift must be voluntary.
There
must not be strings attached to the gift that forces the donor to make the
gift. For example, a payment cannot be treated as a gift if it is required
for the provision of a service or the sale of merchandise to the donor.
2.
The gift must be a transfer of
property.
Ownership
of the property must transfer to the charity. Property includes cash,
capital assets and inventory. In other words, it must be something where
ownership can be transferred. Services are not property and, therefore, no
receipts can be issued directly for gifts of services.
3.
No benefit can accrue to the
donor.
This
concept is easy to apply, but hard to live with. There seems to be a need
for charities to “give something back” to donors beyond a thank you.
Some concessions have been made by CCRA with the establishment of the
notion of nominal value in relation to donor recognition. Nominal value
has been defined as giving recognition of up to 10% of the value of the
gift to a maximum of $50.00. The most common quandary is the
application of this concept in the case of corporate sponsorship when we
offer recognition that is usually immeasurable such as advertising for the
corporation of their donation.
4.
Fair market value
As
mentioned, this concept relates to the valuation of the gift or for what
amount is the receipt going to be issued. Fair market value is defined as
the result of a transaction between arm’s length parties. The challenge
is in applying this concept to the donation of gifts in kind. A donor’s
idea of the value of their gift is often quite different from reality or
fair market value.
Why does it appear that the
“rules keep changing”? It’s not the rules. It’s the application.
The reasons the application may change usually involve a stepping too far
over the line in the application of one of the concepts. Each charitable
donation receipt that is issued reduces the tax payable of an individual
or a corporation to Federal and most Provincial Governments, which of
course, reduces their revenue.
New situations continue to arise
that give cause to consider the application of the guidelines. A current
example is the donation of air travel and other loyalty incentive plan
points. If we apply the concepts discussed, we can determine that this is
property with an owner and if ownership can be transferred to a charity,
the donor could receive a charitable donation receipt. The other issue is
valuation. The fair market value of the points must be determinable on a
sound basis of valuation.
What steps can be taken in
receipting to ensure compliance with the guidelines?
One of the information challenges
of charitable organizations is consistent application of their own
receipting policies. Personnel in the fund development field change
frequently and volunteers are often a large part of fund raising
endeavors. Written charitable receipting policies should be developed by
charities that can be applied consistently no matter who the players are.
The policies can be geared to the particular fund development activities
of the charity so can be quite specific to the organization.
We can share information among
charities on their experiences so that we learn from one another.
One of the most common questions
heard when counseling charities in this area is: “where does it say
that?” It says “that” in the basic concepts. As with much of the tax
legislation, there are some grey areas and reasonableness must be applied
in interpretation. We cannot allow our charities to be party to tax payer
attempts at tax evasion or fraud. When one charity steps over the line,
the whole sector pays in terms of loss of public credibility and a
potential stricter application or changed application of the guidelines.
This also threatens the opportunities we are able to take advantage of in
encouraging greater philanthropic giving.
Betty
Thompson, FCGA,
is a partner with Lo Porter Hetu, Certified General Accountants in
Calgary and focuses on providing services to the not-for-profit sector.
She can be reached at 403-283-1088 or e-mail:
bthompson
@porterhetu.com
Top
of Page
-
Strengthening your
Board/Staff Partnership by Wendy MacDonald
Nonprofit organizations are fortunate to benefit from
the diverse perspectives, skills, and experience of board members, staff
and volunteers. Each plays a critical part in accomplishing the mission of
the organization, but in unique roles. These roles include governance by
the board, management by a senior staff person or Executive Committee, and
implementation by frontline staff and volunteers. Successful organizations
encourage clearly defined roles, but respect the interdependence of all
three functions. They understand that one function or player cannot be
successful without the other. The strength of this partnership is key to a
successful nonprofit organization.
No matter how large or diverse an organization may
be, both staff and board members can contribute to this success through
understanding and informed action. Trust, respect, open communication,
rapport and empathy are basic to building an effective board/staff
relationship.
Fully value each
other
“Both the board and staff will be helped in their
relationship with one another if each of them understands the need for the
other to be capable and powerful…some people think the board-executive
system is just a safeguard against the weakness of one of the partners; if
you have a strong board you don’t need a strong executive director and
vice versa. This seesaw principle may work for a short time…but an
institution only flourishes when conducted by both a competent staff and
board, and when they work well together.” Cyril Houle (1989)
Mutual respect for the board by staff and staff by
board is a cornerstone of a solid relationship. Both need to believe that
the other (individually and collectively) is an asset worthy of attention,
investment and development. Both need to appreciate the other as a way to
leverage talent, resources, and energy to accomplish the mission of the
organization.
Staff, who have had little or poor experience with
board relationships, are sometimes confused about the Board’s role and
value. It is important to orient new staff and volunteers to the function
and responsibility of the board to provide context and understanding to
their actions and decisions. Many frontline staff and volunteers, who do
not understand the board’s role, condemn boards for out of touch
perspectives or elitism.
Role clarity
Critical to a healthy board/staff relationship is the
understanding of all involved about their own purpose and role, as well as
the scope of responsibility of others. Clear role descriptions, defined
authority and responsibility, lines of communication, and accountability
are all aspects of role clarity.
Mutually agreed–upon roles help the board, the ED,
and front-line staff and volunteers ensure that nobody is taken for
granted or defaults their responsibilities. Written role descriptions
allow for planning and keep overlap of effort and gaps in service from
occurring. Redundant effort is demotivating for everyone and wasteful to
the organization and community. A typical area of ambiguity and overlap
often occurs when board committees have mandates similar to staff roles.
Clear terms of reference for committees, with well-defined roles for staff
and volunteers, assist in reducing misunderstanding. Sometimes we are
asked to lead and other times to support. Both are important, but distinct
roles.
Both staff and board members also need to understand
and respect established lines of authority and communication. Designated
staff, who liaise with or support specific board activities, “relate
to” but are not “accountable to” that board committee. They are
accountable to their supervisor, often the Executive Director. There
should be discussion and agreement on staff roles and workload, with final
decision by the senior staff person.
Staff need to understand the role of individual board
members and that the board is a corporate entity with overall legal and
ethical responsibility for the organization. They need to know that they
are not accountable to individual board members, but to the senior staff
person, who is accountable to the board. They also need to understand that
the Board Chair has no more authority than any other Board member, except
as a representative/liaison with the board as a unit.
Recognize and respect
varied organizational cultures and governance models
While all boards have a responsibility to govern,
create policy, and plan for the ongoing mission of the organization, there
are many different styles and approaches used by boards. These are a
reflection of the size, composition, history and culture of the
organization. An all volunteer organization may look very different than a
large staffed organization, as would a Carver model governed organization
from
a more “hands-on” approach to board work. Board
members may have diverse experiences in public, private, and
not-for-profit settings, that influence their understanding of board/staff
roles and relationships. Clarifying approaches and expectations is
critical.
Senior Staff/Board:
Need for a strong dynamic relationship
One of the most challenging relationships is that of
the Board and the senior staff person (Executive Director, General
Manager, CEO).
“Like the tango, the relationship between the
Executive Director and the Board requires a strong sense of balance, a
high degree of trust, a willingness to follow as well as lead, an ability
to communicate clearly, sometimes subtly, throughout the course of the
dance. Partners must temper concentration on their own movements with an
awareness of what is taking place around them. They also need to
understand and respect the form. The tango is not the twist. Although
there is room for originality and invention, there are a handful of
conventions, traditions, and agreements that must be acknowledged and
honored.” Robinson (2001)
“Governance and management roles are never static.
Shifts in the balance of power accompany many changes, whether in
leadership, financial situation, mission, or focus. Tolerance for
ambiguity is required ” Axelrod (1995)
Understand and
exercise authority
Staff
need to be confident in their own roles to fully appreciate the
complimentary roles of those around them. Armed with a clear terms of
reference for their own work, they are much more likely to sustain their
motivation and be productive. Boards are also less likely to overstep
their responsibilities or to micromanage, if they experience staff that
understand and are comfortable with the authority and responsibility they
have been given. Most of the confusion about “who does what” is caused
by ambiguous expectations and weak leadership by individuals responsible
for specific functions and operational areas. Staff can assist boards by
keeping the board’s agenda free of tasks that are staff responsibilities
and boards can help staff by defining clear vision, policy, and other
structure which supports good practice.
Remember you’re on
the same team!
Shared values and goals, through focus on the
organization’s mission, can help board and staff members work more
effectively. Collaboration is only likely to be effective when both
parties see the benefits of a particular goal or plan. Take the time to
reinforce your common vision and the unique but complimentary skills that
can be contributed by both volunteers and staff.
We’re all human
We often forget there are many more issues and
dynamics influencing relationships and behavior, than those we are aware
of. For example stress, personal issues, health, and experiences may
all impact board or staff performance and can change without the other
party knowing the cause.
Support board
recruitment
While boards must ultimately be responsible for
renewing themselves through recruitment and development of new members,
staff have an important role to play in providing leads to interested,
skilled and committed prospective board members. In day-to-day activity,
staff often have more relationships and links to a diverse community and a
different perspective from board members. It is critical, however, that
staff are not expected to directly recruit and choose board members, as a
conflict of interest might arise.
Encourage and
participate in board orientation and development
Staff, especially the Executive Director, can provide
valuable information, support and direction through appropriate
involvement in orienting and developing both individual board members and
the board as a unit. A meaningful orientation, focused on the mission of
the organization and the role of the board is a critical investment in
future board effectiveness.
Make the most of
board meetings
Remember that from the perspective of board members,
the focus of their planning and decision-making is usually at board
meetings. While effective organizations research, prepare, and communicate
between meetings, volunteer board members generally have the greatest
opportunity to debate issues and utilize collective skill and experience
when gathered as a unit. Respect their time and priorities by using the
meeting in an efficient and effective way to surface ideas and concerns
for deliberation, rather than fragmenting action.
Communicate with the
Board
Both staff and boards require timely and accurate
information to perform effectively. Staff, because of their full time
role, networks, and specialized skills often have the ability to research
and summarize relevant trends, issues, and ideas, which support good
decision making by the board. In turn, board members may bring other areas
of expertise and perspectives to the discussion. Shared information,
packaged in useable formats, is critical to sound policy and planning.
Restricting flow of appropriate information, relevant to governance, is
sometimes used a strategy by fearful or controlling staff. The same can
sometimes be said for boards that never involve staff in discussions. Both
situations generally lead to dysfunctional relationships and decisions and
ultimately damage the organization.
Make board work manageable and rewarding
Staff sometimes forget that board members are
volunteers. While most board members commit time, expertise, and other
resources because of their commitment to your mission, the role must have
mutual benefit. While board governance is hard work, it should be
meaningful, productive and genuinely valued. Reasonable time commitment,
clear and honest expectations, and effective use of skills are all
important. Most board members want opportunities to learn, to meet others
who share their values, to be successful and to be involved in enjoyable
experiences. Staff support in achieving these goals is critical.
Effective board/staff relationships take time, trust,
and effort to develop. What can you do to support effective board/staff
partnership in achieving your organizations mission and goals?
References
Axelrod, Nancy R., “Board Staff Relations: A
Balancing Act”, Leadership, July
1995
Houle, Cyril O., Governing
Boards, National Centre for Nonprofit Boards, Jossey-Bass, 1989
Robinson, Maureen K., Nonprofit
Boards That Work, John Wiley & Sons, 2001
Additional resources
related to many areas of board governance, board development, and board/
staff relationships are available through the RCVO. These resources
include books, articles, audiovisual materials, periodicals, noncredit
courses and other learning events. The Voluntary Sector Management Program
at Grant MacEwan College offers credit courses on this topic
macdonaldw@macewan.ca. The Board Development Program offers free group training for nonprofit
boards in Alberta (780) 427-2001.
Wendy
MacDonald is Chair of the Voluntary Sector Management Program at Grant
MacEwan College. She can be reached at 780-497-5267, or e-mail:
macdonaldw@macewan.ca
Top of
Page
-
Students
Provide Pro Bono Legal Assistance
by Anita Mohan
Pro Bono Students Canada (PBSC), a national network
of law schools, law students, lawyers, and public interest organizations,
provides under-represented non-profit organizations with pro
bono legal services. The program is designed to provide
public interest organizations with skilled and committed volunteers while
encouraging a pro bono work-ethic
in students.
PBSC was founded in 1996 at the University of Toronto
Faculty of Law and has since expanded to meet the needs of students and
organizations nation-wide. Over 400 law students in 16 Canadian law
schools participate each year.
PBSC matches law students with eligible organizations
to provide free legal information and support under the supervision of a
lawyer. PBSC students perform services such as legal research, legal
writing, and legal education without monetary compensation or academic
credit. Students generally contribute approximately three hours of
service per week for the duration of the academic year.
An example of an extremely successful placement match
was with Volunteer Alberta. The U. of A. student was asked to help
create a resource for Volunteer Alberta’s members and for the voluntary
sector in Alberta that would address the legal issues around volunteers.
Cyndi Harvey, the Executive Director, in her evaluation said, “All did
an outstanding job of capturing the issues, researching and compiling the
various laws, and developing the ‘Volunteers and the Law in Alberta’
resource.” This resource will provide non-profit organizations and
Volunteer Resource Managers with enough information to help them decide
whether or not they need to seek legal counsel.
To become a member organization or a supervising
lawyer, please contact a Student Coordinator. In Edmonton, contact
Anita Mohan at (780) 492-8287 or pbsc@ualberta.ca.
In Calgary, contact Carolyn Allan at (403) 220-2690 or probonos@ucalgary.ca.
Top of
Page
-
Good
Idea from Hanna
Putting
Your Community Information Online
The Hanna community is excited about the launch of a
web based community portal and events calendar called aroundHanna.com.
The design of this calendar began in response to an identified need for
promoting events and sharing information about the volunteer community.
The concept and development of aroundHanna.com can be attributed to futuristic individuals that include: a visionary
executive director, forward thinking Board volunteers, employees from The
Learning Centre and an enthusiastic web page designer.
On February 13, 2002 the aroundHanna.com
website was officially launched for public access. The uniqueness of this
website is that it is updated by trained members of the non profit
organizations, governmental bodies, local schools and service groups using
the site to make the communications process more efficient for planning
activities, events and delivering information.
AroundHanna.com
is an easy sell for community members, as the task of relaying information
becomes a one step process. The site is extremely user friendly, is easy
to navigate and contains an Events Calendar, News & Information,
Contacts and Links appropriate for each group. While registered groups can
post to their individual web page and calendar, they may also designate
any posting as public and it automatically posts to the main home page
that displays all of the events on the calendar for all of the groups
posting. Each registered group is given their own page to manage within
the community portal and are responsible for updating and posting new
information.
One of the most exciting elements of this project is
the subscription option. Anyone wishing to access community information
may subscribe, free of charge, to any page within the aroundHanna.com portal and any new event or news item will be automatically sent to
their email address. This means as a parent and community participant you
may subscribe to the school page, the minor soccer page, the Kinsmen club
page, the dance association page, your church page etc and you will always
be informed about events and news related to your interests. Imagine
if all the parents subscribed to the minor soccer page for you to
disseminate information and you never had to deal with a phoning list
again?
This community calendar has exciting potential for
other communities to utilize for events and information pertaining to aroundYourCommunity.com. For more information about
aroundHanna.com,
visit the web page to contact the administrator at info@aroundHanna.com.
Or call Jann Beeston, Laurie Armstrong or Sue Brinton at 403-854-2099 for
details.
Top of
Page
-
Fundraising
Volunteers: Where can I find them? Is there a secret hideout where they
congregate?
by Laura Berezan
The answer to this question is "No."
The place that you will find your best fundraising volunteers is from
within your current volunteer staff. These people are already
committed to your organization and customers/clients. They know and
understand your organization and its needs. Your task is to
determine who among this group will be willing to step up to the plate.
According to Ken Wyman & Associates, once you
know what you want people to do you can identify people with experience
and willingness and don’t forget friends of your volunteers and staff.
Are there current volunteers who already have fundraising experience?
Does anyone have experience in sales, media, advertising, journalism, or
public relations? Have they recently received a promotion to a
senior level management position or are they considering running for
political office? Are they recently retired or are “at liberty”
to spend the time that you need? Do they volunteer as a major life
activity? Have they recently moved to the community and want to
develop new contacts? Personal contacts yield more and better volunteers
than posters or ads in papers. Ask staff, board members, current
volunteers, members, and clients if they know of potential volunteers.i
These are some of the questions you can ask of your current volunteer
staff to determine if you have potential fundraising volunteers within
your organization.
Volunteers need to feel that there is an exchange of
value. “If volunteers feel as if they are making a real difference
– or if they’re learning new skills, making important community
contacts, or gaining new experiences in the process – then they’ll be
more likely to stay with you.”ii
They are also more likely to say “yes” to a new role as a fundraising
volunteer.
You then need to train them. They need to know
the campaign plan and goals. They need to feel competent and
informed when approaching a potential donor. If they have a good
experience, they will do it again.
You have now created your own secret hide out of
volunteers that are committed and eager to assist your organization with
its fundraising needs.
i Ken
Wyman & Associates, Where
Do You Find Top Fund Raising Volunteers?
handout in RCVO Information Files under Volunteer Management: Volunteer -
Fundraising (1990?)
ii Frank Walker,
“Volunteerism Under the Magnifying Glass: Advice for attracting and
retaining the “right” volunteers for your organization,” Fundraising
Management,
June 2001: p. 48.
Laura
Berezan is an information and referral consultant with the RCVO.
Top of
Page
-
Book
Review: Grantseekers Toolkit
A three part series
by Cheryl Carter New and James Aaron Quick and published by John Wiley and
Sons
(Book 1) A
Comprehensive Guide to Finding Funding published in 1998.
A step-by-step training tool for potential
grantseekers (and experienced ones alike). Starts at the beginning
with the philosophy of grant seeking – it is an investment, it is a
burning desire, it is a contract, it is their reputation, it is your
reputation, it is your future. It looks at how to find a funder to
match your project, research a foundation or corporation and how to write
the final proposal.
(Book 2) Project
Management and Evaluation published in 2000.
Covers the basics of managing a funded project
including documentation (keeping records), managing project personnel,
events and components and project finances. It covers the process of
evaluation such as creating an evaluation plan, data collection and
analysis, and the evaluation report.
(Book 3) Budget
Toolkit published in 2001.
Begins with project development and the subsequent
budget. The authors look at direct costs, personnel costs, travel
costs, and other direct costs and prices. They conclude with
developing a finished budget and the budget narrative.
All of these books offer basic helpful information
and include forms and worksheets.
This
set is currently available on the shelf at the RCVO and has also been
added to the Learning Resources Centre (LRC) at Grant MacEwan College
(please allow some time for the LRC to catalog these books). To
borrow from the LRC contact Michelle Bezenar, Interlibrary Loans, phone
780-497-5857, fax 780-497-4566 or e-mail :
bezenarm@macewan.ca.
Thanks to the Wild Rose Foundation for funding the purchase of these
materials. Watch following editions of Connections for a complete
list of their contributed items.
Top
of Page
|